1. The defendant,

A. From October 24, 2012 to Plaintiff A 19,591,290 won and its related thereto:

B. Plaintiff B 3,413,96

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is the actual operator of a “D private teaching institute” which provides supplementary learning to middle and high school students.

B. On April 11, 2007, Plaintiff A employed Plaintiff A as an instructor of a private teaching institute and served as an instructor of a private teaching institute. Plaintiff A retired on October 1, 2012.

In addition, on March 14, 201, Plaintiff B joined the said private teaching institute and served as an instructor of the private teaching institute, and retired on October 12, 2012.

C. The plaintiff A was in charge of the first class class, and was in charge of the second class class, and was in charge of the second class class, since 2008, it was paid a monthly salary of 3 million won in relation to the second class (at the time of the enrollment, but later increased). In relation to the second class class, the income was divided by 50% by 50% with the defendant.

Plaintiff

B was in charge of Chinese science, etc. and received a monthly wage of 2.2 million won.

[Ground] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence No. 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to Plaintiff A’s claim

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1 on the claim for high school allowances 1) The Plaintiff asserts that the Defendant should pay 4.2 million won (2.7 million won for high school year year year year year year year year year year year year year year and year year year year year year year 1.5 million won) corresponding to his/her own share (50%) out of the income from high school class from September 11, 2012 to October 10, 2012, since the Defendant did not yet settle the accounts. 2) The Plaintiff asserted that the Defendant should pay the amount of the income from high school year year year year year year year year year of the income from the high school during the above period of study. There is no dispute between the parties, and the fact that the income from the third year year year year year year of high school was 7.5 million won as the Defendant.

(The plaintiff asserted that the third-year income of high school is KRW 1.5 million, but there is no evidence to acknowledge it. Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff A the above high school income of KRW 3.45 million ( KRW 2.7 million) unless there are other special circumstances.

On the other hand, the defendant was absent from office for 10 days in June 2012 by the plaintiff A.