logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2020.06.25 2019가단16791
손해배상(기)
Text

1. As to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) B and C, each of the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant)’s KRW 800,000 and each of the said amounts from May 25, 2019.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The relationship between the parties 1) Plaintiff A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff Co., Ltd”).

) A legal entity that operates an English private teaching institute, the representative of the Plaintiff legal entity, and the Plaintiff C shall be an English private teaching institute operated by the Plaintiff legal entity (hereinafter “instant private teaching institute”).

The Plaintiff B and C jointly operated the instant private teaching institute. (2) From August 2018 to May 2019, the Defendant served as a senior senior superintendent of the instant private teaching institute.

B. The Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed to pay the Defendant 50% of the tuition fees in the case of the first-year student of high school, 60% of the tuition fees in the case of the second-year student, and 70% of the tuition fees in the case of the second-year student. 2) On May 15, 2019, the Plaintiff foundation paid the Defendant the monthly salary in April 15, 2019, and the Defendant paid the amount equivalent to the agreed rate as stipulated in the above 1 of the tuition fees, excluding the unpaid tuition fees, as the wages. 3) The Defendant did not separate the Plaintiff from the tuition fees actually paid by March 2019 and the unpaid tuition fees by March 201, and paid the Defendant the salary on the basis of the students who received the course of study without the Defendant’s consent.

C. The Defendant reported the job seeking advertisements of E private teaching institutes in the vicinity of the instant private teaching institute, and contacted on May 18, 2019 that the Defendant would have worked for E private teaching institutes. 2) The Defendant submitted a resume to F and interview on May 20, 2019, without stating the fact that the Defendant had worked for the instant private teaching institute, and did not inform F of F that he had worked for the instant private teaching institute even if viewed.

3 On May 21, 2019, F decided to employ Defendant as a driving school instructor.

Around that time, the defendant is a student of F who is going beyond the jurisdiction of F.

arrow