1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

[Claim]

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant is a company with the purpose of running a driving school, and the plaintiffs are instructors who worked in the "Seo River", the defendant's business place.

B. The teaching institute has recruited and managed instructors separately from the elementary and secondary high school and the high school and treated them differently. The Plaintiff A was employed as a middle and secondary school C instructor on March 19, 2013 and served until March 27, 2015. Plaintiff B was employed as a middle and high school D instructor on March 4, 2013 and served until November 7, 2014.

C. The Defendant’s educational institute calculated the tuition fees for elementary and secondary school instructors and high school instructors differently. The elementary and secondary school tuition fees for the first and secondary school instructors are determined depending on the duration of the lecture, and the high school principal lecture determined tuition fees depending on the number of students and paid them to the instructors.

After joining the Plaintiff on March 19, 2013, the ranked division of the middle school/high school from around April 2013 to February 2014 to the middle school/high school/high school from around February 2014 to around February 2014 from around February 2014 to the middle school/high school from around March 19, 2014 to the middle school/high school from March 4, 2014 to the middle school/high school from March 4, 2014 to the middle school/high school from March 4, 2013 to December 4, 2013.

D. All of the Plaintiffs were employed as a senior high-ranking instructor, but the senior high-ranking instructor was assigned to him.

The terms of the plaintiffs' lectures according to the period are as follows, and the ratio of the middle and high-ranking lectures to the middle and high-ranking lectures to the plaintiffs during the parallel period of the middle and high-ranking lectures to the middle and high-ranking lectures has been changed continuously according to circumstances.

E. In a case where the Plaintiff’s retirement benefit calculated on the basis of the foregoing is deemed to be the full amount of the Plaintiff’s secondary and high-ranking medical care, the Plaintiff’s retirement benefit is KRW 5,876,414, and KRW 1,065,020, and the amount of the Plaintiff’s retirement benefit is KRW 4,460,256, and the amount of the Plaintiff’s retirement benefit is KRW 890,60,600.

[Reasons for Recognition] Uncontentious Facts, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 7, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiffs of the parties are the secondary high-ranking medical care they received.