Defendants are not guilty.

. Defendant A is a practical operator of B, and Defendant B is a corporation established for advertising agency business.

(a) No one shall display advertisements, etc. on objects prohibited from displaying advertisements, etc. in order to preserve scenic landscapes and public morals, prevent harm to the public, and create a healthy and pleasant living environment;

Nevertheless, on December 5, 2016, the Defendant installed 50 heads of banners as shown in the attached Table of crime, as between December 9, 2016, as well as by December 9, 2016, the width trees, “E apartment 149 million won or more from 149,000 to 14,000,0000 to 6.2 km from 2,0000,0000 to 14,0000 (for use), EPT, 2, and 2,000 (10 minutes)”.

B. Defendant B, who is an employee of the Defendant, committed the Defendant’s act of violation as set forth in A.

2. The judgment prosecutor indicted the Defendants of the installation of the phone number on the banner, based on the confession statement and advertisement agency contract made by Defendant A at the police.

However, according to the legal statement of the FF staff G, an advertising agency company, the defendant company is a disabled organization that has created a formal contract in order to receive the reduction of fines for negligence due to the installation of illegal banner, etc., and the fact that it has established a part-time contract by employing it.

was stated.

G’s above legal statement is a content that leads to the commission of perjury and the confession of one’s crime, and the reasons why the Defendants were to talk about the truth of the case due to the failure to receive money, and the details and circumstances of the actual contract concluded with the Defendants, etc. In this case, the Suwon District Public Prosecutor’s Office in Suwon District Public Prosecutor’s Office in the same case with respect to the Defendant Company.