logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.11.22 2018노1656
옥외광고물등의관리와옥외광고산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

Defendant

A does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

(c) is a juridical person established;

1. No one shall display advertisements, etc. on objects prohibited from displaying advertisements, etc. in order to preserve scenic landscapes and public morals, prevent harm to the public, and create a healthy and pleasant living environment;

On December 2, 2016, the Defendant: (a) anticipated that G, etc. will illegally install a banner without permission from the competent authority; (b) concluded a contract on the banner business with G, which G, to display the phone number in the name of B, and even if it is controlled by the competent authority, the Defendant would pay a fine for negligence in the name of B, even if it is anticipated that G, etc. will do so.

As a result, G around December 5, 2016, through the employees of the sales agency, etc., installed 50 placards as shown in the separate news report, which is an object prohibited from displaying advertisements, and installed 50 placards as shown in the separate news report, “E apartment 149 million won from 149 million to 14,000 won, from 100 million to 14,0000, from 1400 million to 6.2km from 2, Dong coal (10 minutes),” and “4.5*0.9 meters from 2,000 to 9 December 2016.

Accordingly, the Defendant assisted the above crime by facilitating the crime of violation of the Act on the Management of Outdoor Advertising Materials and Promotion of Outdoor Advertisement Industry.

2. Defendant B Co., Ltd. committed the above violation in relation to Defendant B’s business at the date and place specified in paragraph 1, and at the same time and place, Defendant B, an employee of the Defendant Co., Ltd.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendants' statements at each court of law

1. The witness H and G’s respective legal statements in the original instance;

1. Each accusation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 18 (1) 3 and Article 4 (1) of the Act on the Management of Outdoor Advertising Materials, etc. and Promotion of Outdoor Advertising Industry; Article 32 (1) of the Criminal Act; Article 32 (1) of the Criminal Act; Article 32 (2) of the Defendant B, who is selected from each fine, shall be managed by each outdoor advertisement material, etc.

arrow