logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2010. 01. 14. 선고 2009두18110 판결
양도차익 산정시 난방배관 등 수리비용을 필요경비 인정할 수 있는지 여부[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2009Nu5444 (Law No. 23, 2009)

Title

Whether repair costs, such as heating pipes, can be recognized as necessary expenses when calculating gains from transfer.

Summary

The amount claimed to have been disbursed as necessary expenses at the time of the transfer of apartment is insufficient to recognize only by the evidence submitted by the plaintiff, and as long as the transfer income tax is calculated by deeming the converted value based on the standard market price as acquisition value by the plaintiff

The decision

The contents of the decision shall be the same as attached.

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

The records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined. However, the grounds of appeal by the appellant are not included in the grounds prescribed in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, and the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating

arrow