A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 18, 2018, at the main point of the trade name “C” located in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City on May 18, 2018, the Defendant heard the horses that “I will not sell alcoholic beverages to the party,” from the victim D (Nam, 45 years of age) who is an employee of the said main point, and made it interfered with the victim’s management of the said main point by force, such as “I would like to drink you would drink you would drink you would drink you would drink you would drink you would drink you would drink you would drink you would drink you would drink you would drink you would drink you would drink?” “I would see why I would drink you would drink you would drink you would drink you you you would drink you you would drink you would drink you you would drink you would drink you, and it would interfere with the victim’s management of the said main point by force.

2. At around 03:40 on May 18, 2018, the Defendant: (a) received 112 reports from the Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City E-ro, that “the son frights;” and (b) recommended the Defendant to return home to the Defendant by the police officer affiliated with the Fdistrict of the Seoul Geumcheon Police Station, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the police officer G, who was a police officer affiliated with the F Zone G, and the police officer to get home to the Defendant; (c) prevented the Defendant from driving the patrol vehicle by blocking the police officer immediately front of the defective patrol vehicle to stop the patrol vehicle; (d) the police officer continued to move along the patrol vehicle in order to prevent the Defendant from getting off the patrol vehicle; and (e) assaulted the police officer by exercising force against the said police officer.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers on 112 handling reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement of H;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Each CD;

1. Application of each investigation report (to mobile phone photographing images of police officers on the spot, interference with their duties, CCTV images at the scene of obstruction of performance of official duties, patrol boom images, and listening to victim D advancement);

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code among concurrent crimes.