A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Damage to public goods and obstruction of performance of official duties on March 26, 2020, the Defendant was recommended to return to the country after receiving 112 report on the issue of the cost of the taxi fee in front of the 'C Hospital located in the Busan Seo-gu, Busan, Busan, the Busan, the police box of the Busan, and the police box E, the police box of the Busan, the police station, and the police boat F, and the Defendant paid the taxi fee.

Therefore, the police officers, after arranging the scene, trying to move to the patrol vehicle for the patrol duty, interfered with the movement of the patrol vehicle by blocking the front of the patrol vehicle, and interfered with the movement of the police officers for about 30 minutes, such as the fences of the patrol vehicle and the flabing of the relevant patrol vehicle, and the flabing of the relevant patrol vehicle, and the flabing of the patrol vehicle, and prevented the movement of the police officers for about 10 minutes, such as the flabing of the patrol vehicle, and the flabing of the patrol vehicle, even though the flab had prevented the Defendant from getting off from the patrol vehicle and the flabing of the flab, while the flab had moved about about 100 meters by operating the patrol vehicle, while carrying about 100 meters of the flab, following the patrol vehicle.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the patrol car, which is a public object that needs to be repaired in the city, and obstructed the police officer's legitimate performance of official duties concerning 112 reporting and patrol duty.

2. While the Defendant received the date, time, place, and 112 of the taxi engineer’s 112 report from the victim E and the victim F, who was a police officer, were dispatched to the site and heard the statement about the situation, the Defendant expressed that the police officer did not take his/her horse, and that the police officer thought that he/she did not take his/her horse, and that he/she was heard by the victim E, “I am only bit bit bit bit son, bit bit bit bit bit bit bit son, son,” and the victim F expressed his/her desire on several occasions, “I am son other than bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit son, and I am am son.”

Summary of Evidence

1. On the defendant's legal statement F