logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2018.07.17 2018고단195
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

Defendant

B The above fine shall not be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a business owner running the "E Gameland" game in the old and American City D, and the defendant B is an employee in charge of the customer reception and exchange affairs in the above game field.

No one shall engage in the business of exchanging or arranging exchange or repurchase of tangible or intangible results (referring to game money prescribed by Presidential Decree and things similar thereto prescribed by Presidential Decree, such as points, premiums and virtual currency used in game) obtained through the use of game water.

Nevertheless, from September 24, 2017 to November 6, 2017, the Defendants exchanged the game money to KRW 9,000 by converting the amount of 10% per 10,000 per cash after deducting the fee from 45% per 10,000 for many unspecified customers who found the said place from the game in the above game room where 30 prices for the “DDDD” game, and Snish Sea.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to exchange intangible results obtained through the use of game water by customers.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Legal statement of the witness F;

1. Seizure records;

1. Notification of the details of registration of the juvenile game industry (E gameland), investigation reports (related to customers on the spot), and investigation reports (related to attachment of site photographs, etc.);

1. In full view of the following circumstances admitted by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by this Court, Defendant B is considered to be a joint principal offender for the instant crime.

① Defendant B had been employed as an employee in the game of this case since the game of this case opened the game of this case, and Defendant B had been sufficiently aware that the game of this case was conducting money exchange business within the game of this case.

(2) The F is required from an investigative agency to exchange female employees in the game of this case by requesting them to exchange them in this court.

The purport of “..........”

arrow