Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, the Defendants are above two years from the date of this judgment.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a general game providing business entity that operates a mutual game hall called “E” from April 2015 to July 21, 2015, and Defendant B is an employee in the said game room for the said period.

No one shall engage in the business of exchanging or arranging exchange or repurchase of tangible or intangible results (referring to game money prescribed by Presidential Decree and things similar thereto prescribed by Presidential Decree, such as points, premiums and virtual currency used in game) obtained through the use of game water.

Nevertheless, from April 20, 2015 to July 21, 2015, Defendant A operated a business by establishing 80 game machine for “scambling” in the above game in the above game room. When a customer obtains at least 20,000 points by using the above game machine, Defendant B’s former act of exchanging the said point at KRW 1 won per unit while managing the act of exchanging the said point. Defendant B, while in charge of exchanging the above game in the above game room around April 2015, had the key of “scambling” game while making a request for exchange of the points acquired by customers to exchange the above game machine, Defendant B had the key of “scambling” game machine and carried out the remaining points after deducting 10% of commission from the above game room.

In the written indictment, Defendant A obtained profits equivalent to the sum of KRW 77,301,820 during the above period.

Although the statement is written as follows, the exchange made profits equivalent to the above amount during the above period, as seen below in the judgment on the claim for additional collection against Defendant A.

It is difficult to see it as such.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to commit an act of exchanging or arranging the exchange of tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game water.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. A protocol concerning suspect interrogation of the defendant A by the prosecution;

1.With respect to F (tentative).