logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.05.15 2017누89980
최초요양급여불승인처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the plaintiff at the trial does not differ from the allegations in the court of first instance, and the judgment of the court of first instance rejecting the plaintiff's claim, even if the evidence submitted at the court of first instance is examined together with the plaintiff's assertion, by re-examination of the statements in the evidence No. 24 to No. 28 submitted at the trial

Therefore, the reasons for this case are as follows: “B” under Section 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance as “D”; “2914Nu4520” under Chapter 13 as “2014Nu4520”; “No evidence exists that can be found specifically; and “The evidence of the above evidence and evidence Nos. 5 and 22-1” under the main text of the judgment of the court of first instance as “the Plaintiff worked in work on a construction site from October 2006 to June 2010”; “The Plaintiff appears to have been engaged in the field of cement concrete work and cement distribution pipes” under the main text of the judgment of the court of first instance as “the first instance during the period from October 206 to June 2010,” and “the first instance court of second instance during the period from 5:6:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. to 16:0 p.m., each of the above evidence during the period from 200 p.m.

2. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion. Thus, the plaintiff's appeal is without merit.

arrow