logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2014.10.16 2013나69615
물품대금
Text

1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.

(1) The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 684,792,900 as well as to the Plaintiff on March 2013.

Reasons

1. The summary of the case and the facts premised on the case

A. The summary of the case is the case where the Defendant refuses to pay the price for the supply of goods to the Defendant, on the ground that the Plaintiff seeking payment of KRW 684,792,90 for the supply of goods under the supply contract with the Defendant, as well as for the delayed payment of the refund transaction (referring to a transaction in which the first seller resells any goods in sequence among several intermediate business operators who become the first seller, and finally the first seller finally becomes the last buyer) made in the transaction practice as a kind of intervention transaction.

The judgment of the first instance was accepted by the plaintiff, and the defendant appealed against this and filed an appeal.

B. On the premise, 【Evidence’ is a company with the purpose of communications equipment, electronic device, and the manufacture and sale of parts thereof, etc., and (i) the purpose of the entire pleadings, i.e., distribution of telecommunications equipment, electronic device, and parts thereof; and the Defendant is a company with the purpose of selling, installing, and repairing computer products, liquid books, and parts thereof.

⑵ 원고와 피고 사이의 물품구매 및 설치계약 ㈎ 원고는 2012. 7. 4. 피고와 사이에 피고에게 서버(HP BLc7000 BCS CTO Enclosure Server) 등의 물품(이하, ‘서버 등’이라 한다)을 공급대금 684,792,900원(부가가치세 포함)에 공급하기로 하는 내용의 물품구매 및 설치계약을 체결한 다음, 2012. 7. 11.에 이르러 계약서를 작성하면서는 계약일자를 2012. 6.로 표시하였다.

㈏ 원고와 피고는 물품구매 및 설치계약에서 다음과 같이 약정하였다.

- Contract name: The case of delivery of interest-based servers - the place of delivery: the designated place of the defendant - the date of delivery: Separate designation date - the delivery of the goods shall be the responsibility and cost of the plaintiff within the date specified in the contract

arrow