1. Of the part concerning the principal lawsuit in the judgment of the court of first instance, the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) who falls under the following amount ordering payment.

1. The summary of the case under common premise between the principal lawsuit and the counterclaim and the reasons why the court shall explain this part are as follows: "36 items out of 94 items out of 89 items" shall be deemed to be "35 items out of 89 items"; "Edg" shall be deemed to be "Edge"; "(Attachment 2)" shall be deemed to be "Edge"; "(Attachment 2)" shall be added to "Functional summary" in the fourth 15 page, and "(Attachment 3)" shall be deemed to be stated in the summary of the case "1." and the part "2." shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for the cases where "(Attachment 3)" shall be added to "Functional summary" in the fourth 15 page.

2. The judgment of this Court

A. As to the claim in this case, the judgment on the claim for damages caused by the Defendant’s failure to perform the duty to provide the Defendant’s server solution (the Plaintiff’s assertion) [the Defendant, pursuant to Article 2 of the instant service contract, supplied the Plaintiff a “Dynam Synac Synow”, a self-development of the server pursuant to Article 2 of the instant service contract, but failed to perform the duty to build a server solution pursuant to the instant service contract by supplying the media system of the United States, under the Doza Media Synem, as the Defendant developed, under the Doza’s original initiative that was the original initiative developed by the Defendant. The Plaintiff terminated the instant service contract on the grounds of the Defendant’s nonperformance. The Defendant paid KRW 100,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,0000,000,000 won, to the Plaintiff based on the termination of the instant service contract.”

Even if the Defendant did not supply the server chain chain produced originally by itself, the instant service contract on the server chain chain supplied by the Defendant to the Plaintiff is a production supply contract with the nature of the sales.