A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

In order to secure a road necessary for the construction of a building on a parcel of land, such as the husband C and D, the wife E, etc., the Defendant was willing to arbitrarily divide the F, G, and H ownership into a new building, and 1,511 square meters of land (hereinafter “instant land”).

1. On June 19, 2012, the Defendant forged private document: (a) requested L, an architectural designer, at the K company office located in the Shingue PopulationJ, to request L, an owner of the instant land, to “the request for partition to be made by ascertaining the owner’s permission”; and (b) L, upon request, entered “F-2 persons” in the name column of the applicant in the form of application for land alteration, “F-307” in the address column; (c) “Seoul, 1,511 square meters in the land address column of the details of the application; (d) “I 1483 square meters in the address column of the land before the movement”; and (e) “I 1483 square meters in the land address column of the land after the movement”; and (e) stamped the applicant’s seal affixed in advance to the name, and subsequent F, F, G list; and (e) the name and address of the applicant; and (e) seal attached to each of the above persons.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with L, forged a letter of application for land alteration in the name of F, G, or H, which is a private document related to the certification of fact.

2. The Defendant in collusion with L for the use of the above investigation document, which was a public official belonging to the headquarters of the wife population who is aware of the forgery through L in collusion with L, was held as if the application form for the alteration of land was a document duly formed.

3. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Land Survey, Waterway Survey and Cadastral Records submitted, in collusion with L, a forged application for land alteration as seen above, as it had obtained the consent of land division from G, F and H, the owner of the instant land through L in the civil petition service division of the said population.