logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.08.11 2017고단2862
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 2012, the Defendant forged a private document by inserting a computer in the column of the location of the apartment charter contract (monthly rent) at the CG golf practice center office located in the wife population B, the Defendant affixed the seal of G and J on each day, which was arbitrarily rejected in the name of G and broker J, and the seal of J. G and the seal of J, which were arbitrarily identified in the name of the lessor and broker J.

Accordingly, with the aim of exercising the right, the Defendant forged one copy of the apartment lease agreement (monthly rent) in the name of G and J, which is a private document on the duty of rights.

2. On July 18, 2012, the Defendant: (a) requested for a loan to K with money in a golf practice room screen screen, which is located in the wife-population B, Young-si; and (b) granted one copy of the forged apartment rent contract (monthly rent) as if it were actually prepared, the Defendant offered one copy of the forged apartment rent contract.

3. The Defendant, at the time, at the time, at the place specified in the above paragraph (2) and paragraph (1) above, presented a forged apartment lease agreement (monthly rent) to the victim K, and borrowed KRW 15 million, which provides the victim K with the claim of KRW 70 million,00,000,000,000,000, as security, for the claim of KRW 208 Dong-dong 1402.

However, in fact, the Defendant received a subsidy of KRW 67 million from the Korea Land and Housing Corporation, paid KRW 3 million, and entered into a lease contract for the lease of the above apartment from the Korea Land and Housing Corporation, which is the lessor. In fact, the Defendant was merely a lessor having a claim of KRW 3 million and merely borrowed money from the damaged party, and there was no intention or ability to pay the money normally.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceiving the victim and deceiving him.

arrow