A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

No person shall borrow or lend, keep, deliver or distribute access media with the knowledge that such media is to be used for a crime or to be used in such crime.

그런 데도 피고인은 중국 내 전화금융 사기 콜 센터 조직원( 위 쳇 닉네임 ‘C’) 의 지시를 받아 타인의 통장, 체크카드( 이하 대포 통장 )를 퀵 서비스 기사로부터 전달 받아 인출 책들에게 전달해 주는 전화금융 사기조직의 통장 운반 책으로서, 2017. 1. 6. 12:25 경 서울 종로구 동호로 399, 우리은행 종로 5가지 점 앞 노상에서 성명 불상의 퀵 서비스기사로부터 D 명의의 IBK 기업은행 체크카드 (E) 1매, IBK 기업은행 체크카드 (F) 1매, 우체국 체크카드 (G) 1매 등 도합 3매를 전달 받아 보관하였다.

As a result, the Defendant kept three physical cards, which are media access to electronic financial transactions of others, with the intention to use them for crime or knowing the use of them for crime, under the direction of the name and non-sicker, which is the organization of the Chinese telephone finance call center.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Application of respective Acts and subordinate statutes on response to financial transactions;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts and Article 49 (4) 2 and Article 6 (3) 3 of the Act on Specialized Financial Transactions in the Selection of Punishment (Selection of Imprisonment with prison labor);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the observation of protection;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act;

1. Scope of applicable sentences under law: Imprisonment with prison labor for one month to three years;

2. The crime of this case, which was determined to be sentenced, was committed by taking part in the organization of the phishing crime and facilitating the commission of the crime, and the fact that there is a very bad character of the crime, and that there was a record of juvenile protective disposition after transferring the access media under the name of the defendant around April 2015.

On the other hand, there is no history of criminal punishment against the defendant's age yet.