logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2021.03.19 2019가합63866
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Defendant D:

A. On April 22, 2020, Plaintiff A, KRW 300,000, and KRW 100,000,000 for each of the said money to Plaintiff B and each of the said money.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Defendant D received an investment of KRW 300,000 ( KRW A.20,000, KRW C55,000, and KRW C50,000) from the Plaintiff on the condition that, around December 2018, Defendant D paid a total of KRW 300,000 from the Plaintiff (hereinafter collectively referred to as “investment in December 2018”). Defendant D sent money received from the Plaintiff to F who made an “exchange” under the name of the Plaintiff in the vicinity of the Makao casino, and paid 1.7% of the investment under the name of 1.5% from 1 week, and paid 1.5 billion from 200,000,000 won to 1.5 billion from 205,000,000 won from 20,000,000 won from 10,000,000 won from 20,000 won from 20,000,000 won from 1.5.

Nevertheless, around February 2, 2019, Defendant D has concealed the above facts to Plaintiff A and has now become well business.

B. The phrase “a request to make more investments in reliance upon the Plaintiff’s belief” is false, and she received an investment of KRW 100 million in total from the Plaintiff under the same conditions as described in the foregoing paragraph (a) and received KRW 50 million in cash from a new bank account under Defendant D around February 8, 2019 (around February 10, 2019, receiving KRW 50 million in cash) from the Plaintiff, and around February 11, 2019, the Plaintiff was also investing KRW 50 million from the Plaintiff (hereinafter collectively referred to as “investment”).

By March 19, 2019 and March 22, 2019, Defendant D agreed to offer a total of KRW 300 million to Plaintiffs and Plaintiff A ( KRW 100 million received in December 2018), KRW 100 million to Plaintiff B ( KRW 50 million received in December 2018, KRW 50 million), and KRW 50 million paid in December 2018 to Plaintiff C, respectively (hereinafter “instant agreement”).

On the other hand, Defendant.

arrow