logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.02.02 2017구단36154
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. In the course of the disposition, the following facts: (a) the tourism channel of Sep. 5, 2013 (B-2) the date of entry into the Republic of Korea of the U.S. on Sept. 5, 2013; (b) the date of application for refugee status recognition (hereinafter “instant disposition”) and the date of application for refugee status recognition (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on Dec. 30, 2016; (b) the date of the application for refugee status status recognition; (c) the reasons for refugee status non-recognition recognition which is subject to the decision on March 2, 2017; (d) the fact that there is no ground for recognizing the notification of the decision on Mar. 21, 2017; (e) the facts that there is no ground for recognizing the notification of the decision on Jul. 18,

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion is a national of the Egypt Republic of Egypt (hereinafter "Egypt").

The plaintiff was a member of the Muslim management association and provided financial support to the Muslim management group.

The plaintiff is operating a clothing plant in Egypt.

There has been robberyd by violence, and reported this to the police, but the police did not receive any assistance on the ground that it was an unslick-type organization, and rather was threatened by violence in connection with the police.

If the plaintiff returned to Egypt, he/she should be recognized as a refugee since he/she could be threatened with the Egypt police or violence associated with the Egypt police.

B. Determination 1) Article 2 subparag. 1 of the Refugee Act defines a refugee as “a foreigner who is unable to be protected or does not want to be protected by the country of nationality due to well-founded fear to recognize that he/she may be injured on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, status as a member of a specific social group, or political opinion, or who is a stateless foreigner who, due to such fear, is unable to return to or does not want to return to the country in which he/she had resided before entering the Republic of Korea.” 2) The foregoing evidence and evidence as stated in subparag. 3-1, 2, and 5-1, 2, and 3-1 of evidence No. 3-1, 5-1, 2, and 3 are included in the entirety of the arguments, and the following circumstances are

arrow