1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The details of the disposition are as follows: (a) the tourism channel of the status of stay on January 12, 2015 (B-2) the date of entry into the Republic of Korea of the U.S. on January 12, 2015 and (b-2) the date of application for refugee status recognition (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on March 25, 2015 (hereinafter “the date of application for refugee status recognition”); (b) there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition of refugee status non-recognition: (c) there is no ground for rejection of the decision of the decision of the Supreme Court on February 24, 2015 on May 12, 2015 of the date of application for objection; (d) the entries in subparagraphs 1, 2, 1, and 2, and 1 and 2, and the purport of the entire pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion is a national of the Egypt Republic of Egypt (hereinafter "Egypt").

Although the slick-type group demanded the Plaintiff to join the Unslick-type group, the Plaintiff rejected it.

The slick-type group threatened the plaintiff with his will to die.

However, the Egypt government rejected the plaintiff as the Muslim type group, detained the plaintiff, and the plaintiff paid bail money and released the plaintiff.

If the plaintiff returned to Egypt, he/she should be recognized as a refugee because he/she is likely to be stuffed by the Muslimout group or the Egypt government.

B. Determination 1) Article 2 Subparag. 1 of the Refugee Act defines a refugee as “a foreigner who is unable or does not want to be protected by the country of nationality due to well-founded fear to recognize that he/she may be injured on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, status as a member of a specific social group, or political opinion, or a foreigner who is not able to return to or does not want to return to the country of nationality before entering the Republic of Korea due to such fear.” In full view of the following circumstances revealed by adding up the aforementioned evidence and the purport of the entire arguments in Articles 3 and 4 as well as the evidence and evidence in Articles 3 and 4.