logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2018.07.05 2018고단918
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2018 Highest 918] On August 19, 2008, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 700,000,000 as a crime of violating Road Traffic Act (drinking) at the Seoul Western District Court. On June 13, 201, the Seoul Southern District Court issued a summary order of KRW 1,50,000 for the same crime, and on March 16, 2012, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 5,00,000 for the same crime at the Seoul Southern District Court.

On April 14, 2018, the Defendant driven a BN motor vehicle in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of about 0.104% from the front of the light lighting distance in the luminous-dong to the front of the luminous-dong at the time of light lighting and about 590,000 in Seocheon-si, and from about 4km to the front of the limited university, the Defendant driven a BV motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.104%.

As a result, the Defendant again driven a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, who violated the prohibition on drinking at least twice.

[2018 Highest 1266] On April 14, 2018, the Defendant, at around 00:30, was under the influence of drinking on the road at the 590-ro, Seocheon-gu Police Station C, which was under the influence of drinking and tried to sign the report on the circumstances of driving at the State, while the Defendant, who was under the control of drinking on the road at the 590-do-ro, Seocheon-gu Police Station C, the Defendant told the victim of the horses that “A private person L” in this manner, she would be read as “Crist L’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’n h’s face.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the crackdown on driving of police officials by violence.

Summary of Evidence

[2018 Highest 918]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Investigation report (report on the situation of the driver in charge); and

1. Notification of the results of crackdown on the driving of drinking, statement of the situation of the driver of drinking, report on the situation of driving of drinking, and inquiry into the results of crackdown on the driving of drinking;

1. Making teas;

1. Previous conviction in judgment: Inquiry about criminal history, investigation report (the previous confirmation, etc. of the previous history), summary order [2018 order 1266];

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The police of D. D.

arrow