Each of the instant public prosecutions is dismissed.

1. Defendant A is a corporation that manufactures automobile parts, etc., and Defendant B is a corporation that manufactures automobile parts.

Defendant

At around 11:00 on July 4, 2014, the Defendant installed five copies of the “Autdo Cd 2009” among the “Autdo Cd 2012,” “Autdo Cad 2013,” “Autdo Cad 2015,” and “Autdo Cad 2015,” and used them for business purposes.

B. Defendant B, at the above date and place, infringed on the victim’s property rights as above in relation to the Defendant’s business.

2. Each of the facts charged of this case is a crime falling under Articles 136(2)4 and 124(1)3 of the Copyright Act and can be prosecuted only when the victim files a complaint pursuant to Article 140 of the same Act. Since the victim revoked the complaint against the Defendants after the prosecution of this case, each of the facts charged of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(5) of the Criminal Procedure Act.