All prosecutions against the Defendants are dismissed.

1. Defendant A is a corporation established for the purpose of producing fish and power transmission devices, etc., and Defendant A is an official team employee of the company B at Seosan City.

No person shall infringe on author's property rights or other property rights protected under the Copyright Act by means of reproduction, performance, broadcasting, exhibition, transmission, distribution, or preparation of a derivative work.

1. Defendant A

A. On February 15, 2012, the Defendant infringed on the author’s property right by reproducing the “Auta CAD EECTRAL 201”, a software of the victim Oracle 1, which is a file software, in the form of file, in the office of the (ju)B Public Service Team, in order to use the “Auta CAD EECTRAL 201” in the work-related computer installed therein, in the form of file.

B. On February 25, 2012, at the same place as indicated in the preceding paragraph, the Defendant connected the Internet file sharing site using the said computer for the said business purpose, and installed the said computer with downloading “Auta CAD 2008”, which is the victim Ora CAD 2008, and confirmed the drawings for the repair of the factory machinery until September 20, 2012, or infringed the victim’s author’s property right by using the said program when manufacturing machinery equipment.

2. Defendant (State)B infringed on the victim’s author’s property right in relation to his work as described in paragraph (1).

2. The part concerning Defendant A among the facts charged above is a crime falling under Article 136(1)1 of the Copyright Act, and Articles 141 and 136(1)1 of the Copyright Act, and the part concerning Defendant B is a crime that may be prosecuted only when the victim files a complaint pursuant to the main sentence of Article 140 of the Copyright Act. The record reveals that the victim revoked the complaint against the Defendants on February 27, 2013, which is the case after the prosecution of this case.