Each public prosecution against the Defendants is dismissed.

1. Defendant A Co., Ltd. in the facts charged is a corporation located in Daejeon Pungdong-gu C, and a corporation whose main business is the manufacturing business of special purpose machinery, etc., and Defendant B is the representative director of the above company.

No one shall infringe on any copyright by reproducing or using any copyright without the consent or permission of the copyright holder without any justifiable authority.

1. On November 7, 2014, Defendant B, within the above Co., Ltd. A, copied computer programs, such as Auto CAD of Autacc and the victim’s par character Creho of Creho of Creho of Creho (E) in the office of the said Co., Ltd., without permission, and infringed on the copyright of Autdo CAD 2008 reproductions, 11 computers, Auto CAD Mecan 2013 reproductions, 5 computers, Pro-Enbine Wilre 4 reproductions, using two computer services.

2. Defendant A Co., Ltd. committed the above violation in relation to the Defendant’s business at the time, place, and the above B, the representative of the Defendant, at the same time and place as Paragraph A.

2. Each of the facts charged of this case is a crime falling under Article 136(1)1 of the Copyright Act, which can be prosecuted only when the victims have filed a complaint pursuant to the main sentence of Article 140 of the Copyright Act. According to the records, the victims can be recognized as having withdrawn the complaint against the Defendants on November 12, 2015, after the indictment of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(5) of the Criminal Procedure Act.