logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2019.07.12 2019고단3530
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(운전자폭행등)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. From March 31, 2019, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Drivers, Violence, etc.) (hereinafter referred to as “A”), around 03:10 on March 31, 2019, went into the top of E-si operated by the victim D (70 years of age) for returning home before the “C” restaurant located in Michuhol-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, and continued to proceed

At around 03:25 on the same day, the Defendant, who arrived at a destination, refused to pay the taxi charges and was moving to the H district of the Incheon Gyeyang Police Station, provided a bath to the victim, and was at one-time price at the right margin of the victim due to drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim who is a driver of a vehicle in operation.

2. On March 31, 2019, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, around 03:30, at the H district of the Incheon Gyeyang-gu Incheon Gyeyang-gu Police Station located in Gyeyang-gu, Incheon, the Defendant laid the Defendant’s wall on his/her gate, walked two times on his/her string, walking up his/her string, walking up his/her string door, and talking to police officers once, and talked with him/her, by uttering rough or disorderly words and conducts in a riotous manner at the seat of a government office.

3. On March 31, 2019, the Defendant, at around 03:40 on March 31, 2019, went to the said D while under the influence of alcohol, and prevented the J from doing so, the Defendant, by hand, laid down his hand his hand over the J to the bottom of the J, and went beyond the J. Accordingly, the Defendant was arrested in the act of obstruction of performance of official duties, and was arrested in the act of obstruction of performance of official duties, and was fluened by both descendants.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the investigation of police officers' crimes and arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to J and D;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes to a global CCTV image closure photograph and at the time of the incident;

1. Article 5-10 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, concerning the relevant criminal facts and the choice of punishment.

arrow