1. The plaintiff

A. Defendant A and C shall indicate the attached drawings of 2,123 square meters of the land of Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City D forest 2,123 square meters.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff completed a share transfer registration with respect to 2,123 square meters of D forest in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City as follows.

For the purpose of registration of receipt, the Seoul Central District Court (Seoul Central District Court No. 47218, Oct. 2, 1980); 1653/50 of the co-owners' shares 5950, Oct. 2, 1980, the Seoul Central District Court (Seoul Central District Court No. 47219, Oct. 2, 1980) 337/5950 of the co-owners' shares 5950, Oct. 2, 1980

나. 서울 관악구 D 임야 2,123㎡ 중 별지 도면 표시 가, 라, 마, 바, 사, 아, 자, 차, 카, 타, 파, 하, 가¹, 나¹, 다¹, 라¹, 마¹, 바¹, 사¹, 아¹, 자¹, 차¹, 카¹, 타¹, 가를 순차적으로 연결한 선내 ㄱ부분 128㎡ 지상에 무허가 주택(이하 ‘무허가 주택’이라 한다)이 있고, 같은 도면 파¹, 하¹, 가², 나², 파¹을 순차적으로 연결한 선내 ㄴ부분 12㎡ 지상에 창고 건물(이하 ‘창고’라고만 한다)이 있다.

C. Defendant B is an owner of an unauthorized house.

Defendant B allowed Defendant A to reside in an unauthorized house, and Defendant A extended part of an unauthorized house.

Defendant A and C live in an unauthorized house as of the date of the closing of the instant argument.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 1, and the result of the commission of surveying and appraisal to the Korea Land Information Corporation, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. According to the above facts, Defendant A and B without authority build and extend an unauthorized house and warehouse in part of the Plaintiff-owned D Forest in Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City without authority and occupy the relevant part.

Defendant A and C, a resident of an unauthorized house, shall leave the unauthorized house without permission, and Defendant A and B have the duty to remove the unauthorized house and warehouse to the Plaintiff and deliver the relevant forest part, which is the site.

B. Defendant A’s assertion on Defendant A is the co-owner of Defendant B and unauthorized housing, and thus, the Plaintiff is not entitled to remove the housing.