logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원(인천) 2020.07.17 2019나13337
관리단집회결의무효확인
Text

All appeals by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as to the instant case is as follows: (a) the court has partially dismissed or added the reasoning of the judgment; and (b) the allegations emphasized or added in the trial by the plaintiffs are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the determination of addition as set forth in paragraph (3) below; and (c) thereby, the court shall accept such arguments including abbreviations pursuant

(However, the part on the joint plaintiff I of the first instance court, which was separated or added by this court's withdrawal of appeal, is found to be "R", respectively.

7 pages 14 of the judgment of the first instance court are as follows.

In addition to the letter of delegation in this case, the specific purpose of the meeting was listed, and the items listed above are almost identical to each item stated in the notice of this case, and if it is possible to anticipate specific resolution matters, it would be likely to guarantee the exercise of voting rights as a sectional owner in the way of delegation of voting rights. In the case of "case concerning the appointment of an administrator" among the items stated in the notice of this case, it would have been difficult to prepare a written resolution in advance because the termination date of the registration period for the candidate in the administrator was not later than 15 p.m. on the day before the date of the opening of the meeting of this case," "points and 75 households of the above 438 households among the above 438 households, regardless of the guidance of written voting rights, are added."

The 7th 20th 20th son of the first instance judgment "438 households, a half of which" are "370 households, a half of which".

The Supreme Court Decision 201Da100706 Decided May 4, 2018 and the Daejeon High Court, the appellate court of the above case, rendered a decision on September 13, 2018.

arrow