logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고법(인천) 2020.02.07 2019나12655
물품대금
Text

1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

3. Order of the court of first instance.

Reasons

The reasoning for this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for partial dismissal or addition as follows, and thus, this case is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The portion of the judgment of the court of first instance, which is dismissed or added, shall be 9 pages 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance, “A” as “A”.

On the fourth 4th h of the judgment of the first instance, “The Cuba of this case” is deemed to read “the unpaid money out of the Cubae price”.

The 6th 15th 15th 6th 15th 15th 1st 1st 201 shall be added to the plaintiff.

The case of this case in the 8th 11th eth eth 1st eth eth eth eth eth eth.

On December 27, 2017, the term "mortgage contract concluded by December 27, 2017" was read as "mortgage contract concluded by December 22, 2017."

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and all appeals filed by the Defendants are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices, on the ground that the “mortgage contract concluded as of December 27, 2017” in Article 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance is obvious that it is a clerical error in the “mortgage contract concluded as of December 22, 2017.”

arrow