logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고법(인천) 2019.10.25 2019나11034
지연보상금 청구의 소
Text

All appeals by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasons for this part of the basic facts are as follows: (a) the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance; and (b) the same is cited by the main text of Article

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, with the exception of the part concerning this part of the allegations by the parties, with the exception of dismissal or deletion as follows:

2.(a)

Since it is the same as a partial entry, it is accepted by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

On June 6, 2015, the first instance court ordered the Defendant to “the instant construction site E” and ordered “ June 17, 2015” to “ June 4, 2015.”

In the first instance judgment, the “construction suspension” under Article 47(4) of the General Conditions includes not only the “after commencement of construction,” but also the “after commencement of construction.”

The Defendant’s request made on December 24, 2014 and the Defendant’s request made on June 4, 2015, both are based on the grounds attributable to the Defendant and constitutes the suspension of construction. The Defendant’s request made on June 4, 2015, which was made after the Plaintiffs commenced construction of obstacles that were part of the instant construction, even if it is interpreted that “the suspension of construction before commencement” is not included in “the suspension of construction after commencement.”

Therefore, it is difficult to see as ‘the meaning.'

B. Grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance on this part of the facts acknowledged as one of the facts, with the exception of dismissal, addition, and deletion as follows:

2.(b)

1) Inasmuch as partial description is the same, it is cited pursuant to the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. 8 pages 8 of the first instance judgment, “No. 26” is cited as “Evidence No. 26, 28,” and “the first written objection” following the 20th official document (hereinafter referred to as “the first written objection”).

'in addition'.

On June 4, 2015, 2015, E, a construction supervisor of the court of first instance, who belongs to the defendant, shall be the recipient of the plaintiff A’s on-site agent.

arrow