1. Defendant A shall be punished by a fine of 5,00,000 won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 3,000,000 won.

2. The defendants are above.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 21, 2015, around 20:15, the Defendants who interfere with their duties were at the Gellet guide room in Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu-gu, on the ground that the victim does not contact the Defendant, and the Defendant Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party Party:

“The kids, kids, etc. in front of the information room” and the kids, kids, etc., Defendant B, together with Defendant B, took a bath for the large interest, and prevented other customers from entering the area of approximately 20 minutes by avoiding the disturbance.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly interfered with the victim's operation of the telecom by force.

2. The Defendants who interfered with the performance of official duties were required to present their identification cards to the Defendants by the police officer I and J of the Daegu Gangnam-gu Police Station H District, which was called upon 112 reported at the time and place of the above 1.1. The Defendants A, “The police officers of this Category grow out of why they were born, and the bit of bit of a bit of a bit of a bitch.”

Defendant B, in addition, shall be deemed to be a bit of bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a police force.

“A bath theory was made, and assaulted on the floor by cutting off the arms of the above I fishing vessel from the floor.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Legal statement of a witness I;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to a written estimate, investigation report (the date of service and copies of the public official's identification);

1. Article 314 (1) and Article 30 (Crimes of Obstruction of Duties) of the Criminal Act, and Articles 136 (1) and 30 (Crimes of Obstruction of Duties) of the Criminal Act, concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1.Article 37 (former part) and Article 38 (1) 2 of the Criminal Code for the aggravation of concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the attraction of a workhouse;

1. Reasons for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, each of the criminal procedures orders for provisional payment - favorable circumstances: both the Defendants are against each other.