logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.05.18 2016고단955
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months and by imprisonment for six months.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant.

Reasons

Criminal facts

Defendants are employees who work in the same company.

1. On April 1, 2016, Defendants who interfere with the performance of official duties were subject to the expulsion from the police officer G and patrolmen, who are public officials belonging to the police police station of the Ansan-gu Police Station, who were dispatched after receiving a report of 112 from the time they were wraped, in front of the E oil station located in Ansan-si, Seosan-si, Seosan-si, 2016.

Accordingly, the Defendants, while taking a bath, committed assault, such as Defendant B, at the time when she saw the face of the above H as a hand floor, plucked, plucked up, plucked up, pushed up the fingers, pushed up the face of the above G, fright up once a drinking to the face of the above G, and Defendant A added the shoulder of the above G, pushed up the shoulder as his hand, dried up with the mouth, dried up with the mouth of the above H, and dried up twice the bridge of the above H.

As such, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers related to criminal investigation.

2. At the time, at the place, as described in paragraph 1, the Defendants’ insultd the victim G, the police official called the victim G, the victim H, etc., who was dispatched after being reported as above at the time, place, and around the surrounding areas, Defendant A was in the presence of a large number of people, such as the Defendants’ company East I and J.

”라고 욕설을 하고, 피고인 B도 이에 가세하여 “ 씨 발 개새끼 좆 밥 새끼들 엄마도 없는 창녀 자식 새끼들이 뒤지려고 까 부네, 9 급 공무원 짭새 같은 새끼들이 뒤지려고 지랄 병신 짓 하네, 씨 발 애 미 뒤졌냐

“The expression was expressed as “...”

As a result, the Defendants conspired to insult victims openly.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made with respect to G and H;

1. A written statement prepared by I and J;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of related Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs;

1. Articles 136 (1) and 30 (Crimes of Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties) of the Criminal Act and Articles 311 and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Each of the Criminal Code of Commercial Competition.

arrow