Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, it is against the Defendants for one year from the date of the final judgment of this case.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 11, 2018, Defendants in violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (damage, etc. to common property) discovered Dworkunayst taxi parkeded by the victim C in front of the back of 58 weeks, Nam-gu, Incheon, Nam-gu, Incheon, at around 14:25, and thereby damaging the said taxi managed by the victim by jointly destroying the repair cost of KRW 124,410 by pushing the said taxi on the right-hand hand, and by destroying the repair cost of KRW 124,410.

2. The Defendants who interfered with the performance of official duties are on the date and time under Paragraph 1, and at the place, how they “I am slicker’s accompanying slicker’s hand.”

“I hear the horses, Defendant A was able to look at the breath, read the fat with her hand, walk the bat, walk the bat of the batp fat, Defendant B attempted to fat the bat of the G with her hand, pushed the bat and walk the fat of the bat.

Accordingly, the Defendants interfered with the performance of duties by F and G who are police officials.

3. As the Defendants’ insults are observed at the date, time, place, and place under Paragraph 1, Defendant A shall be discarded to the victim G and the victim F.

The Defendant B expressed his desire to bitch bitch farc, “h.h.,” and Defendant B expressed his desire to “this farc farc, the police.”

D. The bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch mar. “Apch bitch bitch bitch fch,” and insulting the victims of approximately 20 minutes by openly obsing them.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to G, F, and C;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. The Defendants of the relevant criminal facts: Article 2 (2) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Articles 136 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act, Articles 311 and 30 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 30 of the Criminal Act (a point of obstructing the performance of official duties).

1. Commercial concurrent defendants: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Code (which are the crimes of interference with the execution of official duties).