logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2017.05.10 2017고정41
고용보험법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 5, 2016, the Defendant violated the Employment Insurance Act by submitting an application for recognition of eligibility for benefits to the effect that he/she was forced to retire on July 17, 2016 from C to B, who is an employee at the office of the Gangwon-gu branch office of the Labor Agency of the Gangwon-gu Local Labor Agency, and recognized the eligibility for benefits for the job seeking. The same year is applicable.

8. Around 19.19. Around the same day, an application for recognition of unemployment was submitted, stating that the employee in charge is still unemployed.

However, in fact, from June 24, 2016 to October 4, 2016, the Defendant was working as an agent at the “E” company located in Chuncheon City from around 2016 to October 4, 2016, and the Defendant continued to have received benefits of KRW 2,198,000 in total four times.

Defendant: (a) around August 19, 2016; (b) around the same year from the Gangwon branch office of the Gangwon-gu Local Labor Office to the account of Defendant for job-seeking benefits; and (c) the same year.

9.7. received a remittance of KRW 2,344,450 in total on three occasions, including KRW 1,172,230, around April 10 of the same year and KRW 1,344,450, around seven occasions.

Accordingly, the defendant received unemployment benefits by fraud or other improper means.

2. The Defendant, at the above date and at the above place, deceivings the branch office of the Gangwon-gu Office of Employment and Labor Agency of the victim among the victims, and then, he/she was transferred the sum of KRW 2,344,450 from August 19, 2016 to October 4 of the same year to the victim for job-seeking benefits.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing requests for joint investigation, inquiries about personal benefits, applications for recognition of eligibility of recipients (including addition of coverage period of the national pension), pledges, applications for recognition of unemployment (including addition of coverage period of the national pension), investigation reports (limited to attachment of suspect A's agency driving day), and E-work logs;

1. Article 116 (2) of the Employment Insurance Act (the point of illegal supply of and demand for unemployment benefits) and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of a fine for negligence;

arrow