1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. (1) In the instant injury, the Plaintiff entered the 37 Staff sergeant on March 4, 1968, and was assigned to C School on March 16, 1969, and from May 10, 1965, the Plaintiff served as C School D D D major Technical Soldiers from around May 10, 1965. (2) At the time, the lower-ranking Staff officers were in line with the lower-ranking officers or were in line with the lower-ranking officers, and the lower-ranking staff officers, including the Plaintiff and B 38 Staff E were in line with the lower-ranking officers on October 9, 1969.

3) Around 02:00 on October 10, 1969, E was sobrupted and taken to the second-class internal secretary room by extracting the knife equipped with the overall size of the new soldiers’ team in order to go to the lower-class staff. The knife the knife of the Plaintiff’s knife and the knife E, knife, knife, knife, and the head of the Plaintiff escaped. The Plaintiff was sent to the base hospital and was hospitalized until October 21, 1969. 4) The Plaintiff was discharged from active service on January 31, 1974.

B. 1) On February 26, 2010, the Plaintiff registered a person of distinguished service to the State (hereinafter “instant injury”) as a result of military service to the head of the Seoul Regional Veterans Affairs Office.

(1) A person who has rendered distinguished services to the State, alleging that he/she has suffered such

5. 31. Disposition was made that does not meet the requirements for registration of persons who rendered distinguished services to the State.

2) The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Minister of Patriots and Veterans Affairs seeking the revocation of the revocation of the determination corresponding to the requirements for persons who rendered distinguished services to the State as Seoul Administrative Court Decision 201Gudan1514, and the above court rendered a judgment citing the Plaintiff’s claim on January 13, 2012. The Seoul Regional Veterans Management Office appealed the said judgment as Seoul High Court Decision 2012Nu4243, but was sentenced to a judgment dismissing appeal on August 24, 2012, and the said judgment became final and conclusive at that time. [Grounds for recognition] The said judgment became final and conclusive at that time, the fact that there was no dispute, each entry (including serial numbers, if any) in Gap’s evidence No. 1

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff's assertion is from E during military service.