1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On August 18, 1966, the Plaintiff entered the Army and discharged it on July 26, 1969. On October 30, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State and an application for registration of persons eligible for veteran’s compensation with the Defendant, asserting that “In the course of military service, combat training was conducted with the Government on June 13, 1967 during combat training, and the left side bridge was changed (hereinafter “instant wounds”).”

B. Accordingly, the Defendant rejected the registration of persons who rendered distinguished services to the State and persons eligible for veteran’s compensation by determining and notifying the Plaintiff on May 30, 2014, on the ground that there is no evidence to verify that the instant wounds were caused in connection with the performance of their duties during the military service, and that there is no causal link between the instant wounds and the performance of their duties, and thus, did not meet the requirements for persons who rendered distinguished services to the State and persons eligible for veteran’s compensation under the Act on the Honorable Treatment of and Support for Persons of Distinguished Services to the State (hereinafter “Act

(hereinafter “Disposition in this case”). 【No dispute exists, Gap’s evidence 1-4, Gap’s evidence 3-1 through 3, Eul’s evidence 1-4, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. While completing combat training, the Plaintiff’s assertion is undergoing a combat training and falling under the head of the internal affairs team, and the Plaintiff was faced with a view to the front left-hand side, and was receiving treatment at the Army Hospital due to the instant wound. After being discharged from the military, the Plaintiff was suffering from a chronic alley of the left-hand side of the instant wound and under the treatment after being discharged from the military.

On the other hand, the instant accident occurred during military service, and thus, the instant disposition that the Plaintiff was deemed as a person or soldier or policeman on duty who rendered distinguished service to the State, even though it was necessary to recognize the Plaintiff as a soldier or policeman on duty.