logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2017.10.25 2017고정308
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a sexual traffic business establishment under the trade name called "C" in Pyeongtaek-si B, and D is an employee of the said sexual traffic business establishment.

No one shall act as a broker for commercial sex acts. On March 9, 2017, the defendant received KRW 130,00 from customers on March 21, 2017, and arranged to engage in sexual intercourse by guiding customers E and customers who are commercial sex acts to be pushed away. On March 23, 2017, the defendant arranged D to receive KRW 130,00 from customers at the above commercial sex acts establishments and to provide them with a sexual intercourse by guiding them in a secret room. The defendant arranged to engage in commercial sex acts from March 9, 2017 to March 23, 2017.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. G statements;

1. A copy of each statement in D, H, I, and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on photographs, site photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 19 (2) 1 of the same Act (generally, selection of imprisonment with prison labor);

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (within the scope of the recommended sentencing criteria) of the suspended sentence;

1. The basic area (from June to April 1) of the sentencing criteria shall be applied [the scope of the recommended punishment] 19 years of age or older and the mediation, etc. of sexual traffic (the mediation, etc. of sexual traffic by giving and receiving business prices, etc.) of the types of Class 2;

2. In light of the fact that the Defendant, who had been under control on March 9, 2017, engaged in the brokerage business and re-control on March 23, 2017, the Defendant selected a sentence to imprisonment; however, the Defendant has no record of criminal punishment; and the Defendant has suspended the execution of the sentence as ordered in consideration of all the sentencing conditions, including the size of the instant sexual traffic business establishment, the operating period, and the import.

arrow