logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.10.31 2013가합507318
공사대금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 1,936,43,370 for the Plaintiff and 6% per annum from January 1, 2013 to October 31, 2014.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff entering into the instant contract, etc. refers only to “Defendant”, except where it is necessary to refer separately to the National Defense Facility Headquarters and the financial commissioner, etc. under the Defendant.

In addition, the contract for construction works, additional contract for construction works, and additional contract for construction works, the contract for construction works, and additional contract for construction works are additionally stated in the table below, and the contract for construction works is long-term continuing construction in a long-term continuing construction method in which construction works by number are conducted within the budget of the year concerned, and the contract for construction works by type, which are the total contract amount by number of borrowed vehicles

In the instant case, the total number of contracts and the first number contracts were concluded as one contract on the same day, and the following is a change in the number of contracts when the “number of contracts” or “number of contracts” is changed, and the total number of contracts are changed when the “total contract amount” or “total construction period” is changed.

A. Each party entered into the agreement

(2) “The instant construction works” and “the instant contract for the said construction works” and “the instant additional construction works” are “the instant additional construction works” and “the instant additional contract for the said additional construction works.” On February 8, 2010, 49,432,582,100, 100, 000, 00 on December 31, 201, 200, 200, 200, 300, 200, 40, 200, 205, 200, 30, 200, 200, 10, 200, 200, 200, 30, 10, 201, 25, 20, 201, 30, 20, 25, 204, 20, 10, 2010, 36, 2010, 214, 4.

arrow