logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.08.11 2015고단1026
자동차관리법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Attachment] Defendant A, Defendant B, and Defendant C engaged in the vehicle maintenance business, Defendant C, a person engaged in the vehicle maintenance business, and the “F” operated by Co-Defendant E separated from Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Co-Defendant D (hereinafter “E”), listen to the talk that he operates the odometer, and had the meter board sent it to the “F” through the door line, with the intent to operate the odometer.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On August 10, 2014, Defendant A sent 120,000 km of the original running record of the pertinent meter board to Defendant A’s “H” operated by Defendant A in the south-gu Port G, Nam-gu, with the meter plate and cash 70,000 won for selective compensation, and Defendant A received the said meter board and cash around that time, and then changed 120,000 km of the original running record of the meter board to 100,000 km.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspired with E to change the odometer.

2. On September 2013, Defendant B sent 120,00 km of the Plaintiff’s joint criminal conduct to Defendant B’s “K” operated by Defendant B in Daegu-dong-gu, Daegu-gu, which included 2010 vehicle strawers and cash 70,000 won, to her son, and Party B received the said meter and cash around that time, and then changed 120,000 km of the original running record of the said meter to 10,000 km.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspired with E to change the odometer.

3. On August 2014, Defendant C sent 20,000 km of the Plaintiff’s joint criminal conduct to “F” in the “M” car center in Daegu-gu L, Daegu-gu, where Defendant C works for Defendant C, containing the instrument board and cash 50,000,000 won from the Plaintiff, and “E” received the instrument board and cash around that time, and then changed 200,000 km of the original driving record of the instrument board to 10,000 km.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspired with E to change the odometer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A third-time protocol of interrogation of suspects to E;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning the N;

1. Protocol of seizure;

arrow