logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.08.25 2015고단1026 (1)
자동차관리법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Judgment of the court below] The Defendant, who is engaged in the secondhand sales business, listen to the talk that he operates a vehicle odometer in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government “D” operated by Seongdong-gu Seoul, operated by “D,” with a view to operating the odometer by sending the meter board to the above “D.”

【Criminal Facts】

On March 2014, the Defendant sent the instruments and cash 50,000 won from the “F,” operated by the Defendant, who is permanently residing in Habman E, to the “D” in 2010, containing the instruments and cash 50,000 won, and C received the instruments and cash at around that time, and then changed the original driving records of the instruments to 70,000km.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspired with C to change the odometer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A third-time protocol concerning suspect examination of prosecution against C;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Seizure records;

1. A report on internal investigation (the details suspected of being a used vehicle operator who has requested the operation of the odometer);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to an investigation report (ECU, photographed at the suspect's office as to the execution of search and seizure, confirmation of home delivery place, confirmation of delivery place as to home delivery place as to the CJ Round engineer, H and telephone), and other related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 79 subparagraph 16 of the Automobile Management Act, Articles 71 (2) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Where there is any inevitable reason prescribed by Presidential Decree, such as breakdown or destruction of reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (Article 14-2 of the Enforcement Decree of the Automobile Management Act strictly limits the time when a government office's certificate or confirmation thereof is applicable to certain reasons and it is strictly limits the time when the government office's certificate or confirmation is obtained), no person may change the mileage of a motor vehicle. However, the crime is not weak in that the defendant recklessly operated the odometer of a used vehicle

However, the defendant himself.

arrow