(영문) 의정부지방법원고양지원 2017.06.28 2016가단85411

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 의정부지방법원고양지원 2017.06.28 2016가단85411

손해배상(자)

Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On September 16, 2015, the networkF (hereinafter “the network”) driven a private two-wheeled motor vehicle (hereinafter “the instant two-wheeled motor vehicle”) owned by it, and driven a one-lane of the private-wheeled motor vehicle (hereinafter “the instant two-wheeled motor vehicle”) in the direction of fluence in the vicinity of the high-end high-speed village apartment at the vicinity of the high-speed village in the vicinity of the high-speed village.

Although the deceased changed to a stop signal, he entered the intersection as it is, and the part front of the H-business taxi vehicle (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant vehicle”) driven by G, which was driven by G, which was driven in accordance with the new direction of the left-hand general hospital, from the high right side of the running direction, was completely collisioned with the two-wheeled vehicle in this case.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). The Deceased died on September 17, 2015 while receiving treatment for the instant accident.

B. The Plaintiffs are the children of the Deceased, and the Defendant is the owner of the Defendant’s vehicle, who runs the taxi business using this.

[Reasons for Recognition] The facts without dispute, Gap evidence 2-1, 2, Gap evidence 3, 4, Eul evidence 1, 2, and 3, each of the images of Eul evidence 4 and 6, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. As the driver of the defendant vehicle, the driver of the defendant vehicle, who was driving by the deceased, has entered the intersection first, and therefore has been engaged in the concession operation. In addition, he had a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle by looking at the right of the front, and neglected to do so even though the five-lanes of the five-lanes of the defendant vehicle could only bypass. Since the accident of this case occurred due to the negligence of the driver of the defendant vehicle, the defendant is liable to compensate for the damage suffered by the deceased and the plaintiffs due to the accident of this case as the owner of the defendant vehicle.

B. The Defendant’s instant accident is the front part of the Deceased who proceeded with an intersection in violation of the signal.

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.02.03 2014나60384

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.09.27 2017가단5076421

-서울중앙지방법원 2018.11.29 2018나25488

-서울중앙지방법원 2015.10.16 2014가단5031984

-서울중앙지방법원 2018.02.09 2017가단5078359