1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the money ordered to be paid below shall be cancelled.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who has entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to A car (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), and the Defendant is the owner of B-type taxi (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

B. At around 23:20 on January 11, 2014, C driven the Plaintiff’s vehicle, and driven the Plaintiff’s vehicle along the two lanes among the five-lane roads located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Yeongdeungpo-gu, 201, and passed the said intersection to the right-hand side while passing the intersection, changing the lane to the four-lane to the right-hand side, while driving the vehicle in accordance with the five-lane direction at the time at the point where the said intersection ends, and, at a rapid speed from the point where the said intersection ends to the front of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, followed the left-hand side of the Defendant’s vehicle entering the front of the said intersection to the front side of the Plaintiff’s right-hand side.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

In the intersection where the accident of this case occurred, the intersection is located at the point at which the intersection is terminated, and there are two lanes between the two roads (each two lanes), and the intersection is set up between the two roads. The one-lane road of the five-lane road where the original Defendant is running, and the two-lane road of the two-lane road is in the form in which the left turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn, and the two-lane is in the shape in which the vehicle flow can be turned down as part of the above intersection. According to the above intersection, the two-lanes are set up in the two-lane, the three-lane is the one-lane is the one-way road of the two-lanes of the highest elementary school, the four-lane is the one-lane, and the five-lane is the one-lane, the two-lane, and the one-lane, the two-lane, and the one-lane, the two-lane, and the two-lane, and the two-lane road.

By March 27, 2014, the Plaintiff paid KRW 7,047,890 as insurance money, in total, the sum of the medical expenses and the agreed amount of the Defendant vehicle D and E.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6, Eul evidence No. 3, or the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Plaintiff’s assertion by the parties is the Defendant’s vehicle.