logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.10.16 2014가단5031984
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) each of the Plaintiff A and B KRW 6,052,376, Plaintiff C, D, and E, KRW 500,000 and each of them on March 6, 2012.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. A. On March 6, 2012, the network F (hereinafter “the network”) driven by the Obain on or around March 19:15, 2012, led to a shock on a taxi (hereinafter “the instant accident”) that had been going to the left of the Myeon office from the direction of the Myeon office to the Myeon office (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) while driving the Obain in the parallel of the frontwest-gun, the west-gun, the west-gun, and the head of the Myeon office (hereinafter “the instant injury”). Accordingly, the Defendant suffered an injury (hereinafter “the instant injury”).

B. From March 6, 2012 to August 31, 2012, the Deceased was hospitalized at the Seoul Asan Hospital, etc., and was discharged thereafter and received outpatient treatment.

C. However, around November 28, 2012, the Deceased was found to have died at his house located in the Jeonan-gun G located in the Jeonan-gun, Jeonbuk-gun on November 16:25, 2012, and the private person was a heart-oriented death due to a brudial heart disease.

Plaintiff

A and B are parents of the deceased, and the Plaintiff C, D, and E are siblingss of the deceased, and the Defendant is a mutual aider for the Defendant’s vehicle.

[Ground for Recognition: Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 6, purport of whole pleadings]

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The driver of the Defendant’s vehicle liable for the injury of the instant accident caused the instant accident in violation of the duty of care to safely pass through according to the priority of passage, after temporarily stopping or going through the intersection prior to entering the intersection. As such, the Defendant is liable to compensate for the damage of the instant accident sustained by the Deceased due to the said accident.

B. The Plaintiffs are liable to compensate for the deceased’s death, and the deceased, who did not have any person who caused cardiopulmonary ties, caused a booming disorder due to the injury to two parts caused by the instant accident, resulting in an increase in the body. The occurrence of cardiopulmonary ties or stress caused by the restriction of operation and disability caused by hospitalized treatment, etc., and eventually, the deceased died due to a bruptal heart disease.

arrow