logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.08.20 2012고단11719
사문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On May 16, 2007, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 700,000 for a fine of KRW 100,000 for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in Ansan Branch of the Suwon District Court, and on December 19, 2008, a summary order of KRW 2,50,000 for a fine of KRW 2.5 million for the same crime, etc.

【Criminal Facts】

"2012 Highest 11719"

1. On June 5, 2012, at around 22:34, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act and the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license), the Defendant driven BM5 automobiles while under the influence of alcohol with 0.122% of alcohol concentration without obtaining a driver’s license from the front side of the Incheon Cheongjin-gun Fishery Products Center for the Promotion of Heung-gun, Incheon to the red street in approximately 3km from the front side to the red street in 238-71 of the same Ri.

2. Violation of the Resident Registration Act, fabrication of private signature, and investigation and signature;

A. In violation of the Resident Registration Act and the Defendant: (a) at the time and time set forth in paragraph (1), from the red street set forth in paragraph (1) to the point of view that the Defendant had been asked to produce a driver’s license by an assistant C belonging to the Incheon Central Police Station, which was in the duty of regulating drinking driving, while driving in the same manner as described in paragraph (1).

The Defendant informed C of the personal information of “E” and let C know of the fact that he had C enter the drinking-free driver of a personal information terminal (PDA) drinking control into “E”, and signed E in order to request C to sign the driver’s signature.

Accordingly, the defendant used another person's resident registration number unlawfully, and forged E's signature for the purpose of exercising it.

B. The Defendant exercised the above investigation signature by allowing C, who is aware of the forgery at the above date, time, and place, to transmit the forged E’s signature to the traffic police computer network by presenting it as if it was duly formed.

3. Forgery of private documents and the display of private documents;

A. The Defendant forged a private document under Article 2-A.

The date, time, and place mentioned in the subsection above.

arrow