logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2013.12.04 2013고단6558
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Power】 On July 24, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of 2.5 million won by the Incheon District Court for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) at the same time.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On August 4, 2013, at around 01:25, the Defendant driven a B-learning vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of about 200 meters from the roads near the fest fest fest of Gyeyang-gu Incheon, Gyeyang-gu, Incheon, to the roads front of 1059, 01:32 on the same day, while under the influence of alcohol content of 0.120% without a driver’s license.

2. On August 4, 2013, the Defendant, at around 01:32, 201:32, driven as indicated in paragraph (1) on the front side of a slot boat located in Gyeyang-gu, Incheon, Gyeyang-gu, Incheon, Gyeyang-gu, 1059, with the mind that the Defendant was driving as stated in paragraph (1), and was in mind as if he was requested by C to present a driver’s license from the superintendent of the Incheon Gyeyang Police Station affiliated with the Incheon Gyeyang Police Station in charge

Accordingly, the Defendant informed of the aforementioned D’s personal information and caused C to enter a drinking driver on the result of the control of drinking driving (PDA) into D’s personal information, and made C sign the D’s signature in the signature column for drinking drivers, and continued to transmit C’s signature to C through the Transport Police Computer Network by presenting C as if the signature of D was duly formed.

Accordingly, the defendant forged D's signature for the purpose of exercising it, and exercised it.

3. Of the report on the driver’s name, among the report on the driver’s juging driver’s statement issued by the above C using the test-type pen at the same time and place as described in paragraph 2, the Defendant’s forgery of the private document and the use of the above investigation document is a document which has been duly formed with the driver’s name and stamped on the right side, and the driver’s report on the driver’s juging driver’s statement, which was forged to C who continued to know the forgery, is a document.

arrow