logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.01.10 2013고단2685
부정수표단속법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

[2] From May 22, 2009, the Defendant entered into a check contract with the Ministry of Health and Welfare and the Defendant from May 22, 2009, and traded a check.

On December 30, 2012, the Defendant issued one copy of the check number in the “C” office operated by the Defendant in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, as the check number “D”, the check amount “three million won”, and the date of issuance “three million won” under the name of the Defendant.

On March 5, 2013, the holder of the check presented the payment order to the bank on March 5, 2013.

However, the defendant did not receive the suspension of transaction.

In addition, from around that time to January 3, 2013, the Defendant issued two copies of household checks, the sum of which is 6 million won, as shown in [Attachment Table 1] 1 and 2 between the Defendant and that time, and prevented him from being paid on the date of presentation due to the suspension of transaction.

[2013Kadan4622] The Defendant entered into a check contract with the agricultural branch office and the Defendant from May 22, 2009 in the name of the Defendant and traded household checks.

On December 30, 2012, the Defendant issued one copy of the check number “E”, the check amount “3,00,000,000,” and the date of issuance in the name of the Defendant’s “C” office operated by the Defendant in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, the Defendant issued one copy of the bank household check in the name of the Defendant.

On March 27, 2013, which was within the time limit for presentment of payment, the Defendant did not pay as a shortage of deposit even though the check was presented to the above bank. From March 5, 2013, the Defendant issued a total of KRW 36,00,00 in the face value as shown in the attached Table 2 Nos. 1 through 4, 6, 8, 10 through 15 of the daily list of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Application of each statute on a written accusation;

1. Article 2 (2) and (1) of the Control of Illegal Check Control Act with regard to facts constituting an offense and Article 2 (2) and (1) of the same Act with regard to the selection

arrow