(영문) 대전지방법원 2019.08.08 2019고단1885

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대전지방법원 2019.08.08 2019고단1885

강제추행등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 20, 2019, at around 20:30, the Defendant committed indecent act by compulsion, the Defendant: (a) in front of the parking lot C located in Daejeon Dong-gu Daejeon, and (b) in front of the victim D (here 24 years old); (c) in response to the victim’s intent, the Defendant used the part above of the chest; (d) the part above of the chest; and (e) the part above of the part above of the part; and (e) attempted to run back to the victim; and (e) attempted to run back to the victim; and (e) the victim was able to take a sound against the victim’s will, and (e) the victim was able to enter the part above, and (e) attempted to have the part above of the part above of the part, and (e) attempted to run back to the face.

Accordingly, the defendant committed an indecent act against the victim.

2. At around 21:43 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) discovered a slope H, a police officer belonging to the Daejeon East Police Station G police station, which was called “the man who took alcohol before and after receiving a report of 112 that he was in the process of business interference; and (b) discovered a slope where the above F business owner and the Defendant’s children are under the influence of alcohol; and (c) without any specific reason, the police officer I expressed to the above police officer “I am, dys, dys, sys, sys, sys, and syke at home,” and expressed to the police officer “I am, sys, syke, sys, sykes, and sykes,” and expressed to the police officer “I am, syaks, sykes, sykes, and walked three times the troke and walked sys.”

The Defendant continued to be arrested as a flagrant offender due to the above act, and the Defendant informed the Defendant of the sacrific principle, etc., and assaulted the right h's right sacrific h's right sacrife.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the handling of the 112 reported cases and the lawful execution of duties concerning the arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to J, D, I, and H;

1. The K's statement;

1. On-site photographs, on-site photographs C.

유사 판례

-부산지방법원 2015.06.25 2014고단9360 (1)

-인천지방법원 부천지원 2015.09.03 2015고단1810

-서울남부지방법원 2017.05.30 2017고단325

-수원지방법원 2014.07.09 2014고정1402

-대전지방법원 2015.01.22 2014고단3745