logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.01.13 2016나2037493
대의원결의대회무효확인
Text

1. The plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, and this case is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment, except for partial revision as follows.

6 pages of the decision of the first instance court shall be placed under "in accordance with Article 9 of the Regulations of the National Transport Industry Trade Union" and "National Transport Industry Trade Union" of the same 10 pages.

The 1-3 acts at the bottom of the fourth judgment of the court of first instance shall be revised to "(based on recognition) without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 10, Eul evidence No. 1, and the purport of the whole pleadings."

Article 45 "Article 46" shall be amended to "Article 46", and Article 23 (15) "Article 23 (115)" shall be amended to "Article 23 (11)" at the bottom of 13 pages.

In addition, the plaintiffs asserted that there was a "special reason" that could not convene an extraordinary board of representatives because they did not respond to a request from the Central Committee for convening a general meeting, on the grounds that the two acts of the 19th sentence of the first instance court's 19th sentence and the 19th sentence of the defendant's 19th instance court's 2nd sentence " difficult to determine. It is also difficult to determine." In addition, the plaintiffs' claims that change the C Headquarters to the council form under the defendant's c headquarters correspond to the dissolution agenda of the C Headquarters, and the plaintiff A does not respond to the request of the Central Committee for convening a general meeting, not the

The head of the 23th sentence of the first instance court's decision shall be changed to "the head of the 23th sentence", and the 14th sentence of the same 4th sentence to "the approval of the chairperson of the Association" shall be changed to "the Convening Authority by obtaining the approval of the chairperson of the Association."

2. In conclusion, the plaintiffs' claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow