logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.05.31 2015가합23303
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against C who is represented by the plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff is a branch church affiliated with D religious organization (hereinafter referred to as the "EEU"), and since 2008, F was a person who was in office as the 6th executive officer of the plaintiff from around 2008, and Defendant B, Selection G, H, I, and J were the head of the plaintiff who supported the Appointor F.

B. At the time of December 6, 2013, the ENod Association trial division is the president of the party branch, who represents the plaintiff as an Enod Association president.

With respect to the former representative F, he did not follow the procedures for the judgment as the K chairperson of the A church, did not remove some of the members from the church without going through legitimate procedures to cause confusion of the church, and did not go through confusion of the church, disregarding the decision of the E-EU trial court, and led the judgment in violation of the trial procedures, and caused the dispute, such as filing a complaint by the members, filing a lawsuit, and filing a claim, etc., for one year.

C. On October 20, 2013, the Selection F announced that he/she held a joint council of the Allied Council, and that he/she passed a resolution to enact the rules of the Allied Council on November 22, 2013 (hereinafter “instant postponement of administration”). On December 15, 2013, the Selection F announced the suspension of administration (hereinafter “instant postponement of administration”), which would not comply with the decision of the EEU. On December 15, 2013, he/she publicly announced the amendment of the rules and the convening of a joint council to amend the rules.

On December 18, 2013, the ENo-Council trial court rendered a judgment dismissing the Appointor from office on the ground that “The Appointor was indicted for an offense such as false entry in the original copy of a notarial deed in connection with the disposal of the Plaintiff’s property, not only did he/she left the post, but also rejected summons of the ENo-Council trial court, insulting him/her, and passed it to the ENo-Council by declaring the suspension of administration during the trial (hereinafter “instant dismissal judgment”).

E. On December 19, 2013, the E-EU trial division is a temporary chairman of the A church and a pastor, who is represented by the Plaintiff’s representative.

arrow