1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a church belonging to the A religious organization D and its subordinate organization.

B. On September 22, 2014, the judgment of the D General Assembly of A Religious Organizations rendered a decision against the Defendant regarding the following (hereinafter “the judgment of the general assembly of this case”) regarding the decision to dismiss or dismiss the Defendant.

The text of a judgment: It shall be restored to the original state that the E- Labor Association withdraws from office of the defendant.

Grounds for Judgment:

1. It is recognized that the Eno-Council trial party has an error in composition and decision.

2. The appellant is recognized as having held a joint meeting without a resolution of the party, even during his suspension from office.

3. The Defendant is expelled until the spring No. 2015, and the Plaintiff shall pay 20,000,000 won to the Defendant until the spring No. 2015.

C. On December 10, 2014, the Assembly of A Religious Organizations asked the question as to whether the president of the E Union should restore the status of the defendant without conditions according to the decision of the instant general assembly trial, and answer the purport that “the decision of the above general assembly trial state is to restore the defendant to the original state, deeming the existence of illegality in the composition and judgment of the E Union trial state, and that the decision of the above general assembly state is unlawful, and that the defendant holds a joint council without the resolution of the party branch during suspension from office is also illegal and that it is also illegal, and therefore, the defendant issued a letter of change of the union which the defendant wants after the restoration to the original state, and the defendant suspended the defendant’s right to the plaintiff until this title.”

On January 6, 2015, the EEU notified the Defendant of “the Defendant’s authority to suspend the president’s authority to the Plaintiff, and the president of the Plaintiff’s party to the case notified the Defendant of “F wood that was sent by ENono Association.”

E. On February 25, 2015, the Assembly of A Religious Organizations: (a) whether enforcement power, which is the validity of the decision of the Assembly of this case and relevant to the validity of the decision of the Assembly of this case, is limited to the text of the said decision of the Court; or (b) reasons therefor.