beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On October 19, 2015, the Defendant of fraud, on October 19, 2015, told the victim C to pay the amount without a mold, “on the basis that he/she has to pay the amount that he/she has to pay to him/her he/she is obliged to pay to him/her at the glass report room that he/she works in his/her country.”
However, in fact, the Defendant received the statement from D that “if there is a passbook with an amount of KRW 900 million received as a miscarriage, and the Defendant was unable to withdraw the above money due to tax, he borrowed money from the victim in order to raise money to grant a loan to D, and there was no confirmation as to the authenticity of the words D, and thus, it was uncertain whether to receive money from D because it was not possible to confirm the authenticity of the words D. The Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E-B lending 201, the only property of the Defendant, which is the property of the Defendant, had no property value due to the establishment of a large amount of collateral security, and the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the money even if he borrowed money from the victim because there was a large amount of monthly income but there was no change in the monthly income.
As a result, the Defendant received KRW 2 million in cash from the two-way stations in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seoul, on the same day.
2. On October 20, 2015, the Defendant of fraud, on October 20, 2015, told the victim to pay money within one month by obtaining a loan from Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E-Ba-dong 201, which is owned by B, if he/she lends three million won as the head of the Tong used for the Bosping and asking three million won to the Plaintiff via telephone from the French land.
However, in fact, the Defendant did not have any specific property, such as Paragraph 1, and there were many loans that should be paid monthly, while the monthly income was not variable. Since the above lending was set on a large number of collateral, it was no longer possible to receive a loan as collateral. Therefore, even if lending money from the victim was made, there was no intention or ability to pay on the date of repayment.