Defendant

B Imprisonment for eight months, Defendant A shall be punished by a fine of three thousand won,00,000 won.

Defendant

A The above fine shall be imposed.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A as a custodian of E in the time of truth-finding, the F becomes aware of each other while entering the bowling place customer, and the defendant B was working as an examiner of the prosecution.

1. Defendants’ crime

A. On October 17, 2014, the Defendant: (a) from the influence point of time to the end of the P.M. on October 17, 2014, the Defendant took control over F by telephone from A as a violation of the Korean Racing Association Act around 15:00 on the same day; and (b) requested police officers to make a solicitation to prevent F from being detained.

Accordingly, at around 19:00 on the same day, the Defendant had the mind to demand F to demand money as school expenses from the studal h in the trade name of H located in G in J in J in J in J in J in J in J in Jin-si, and had F in order to assist F in handling the above case well, demanding to change the school expenses so that the above case can be handled well through A, and received cash of KRW 3 million from F in the front of the above studal wal wal h through A in the name of a solicitation for the above case

As a result, the defendant received money and valuables under the pretext of soliciting the cases handled by public officials.

B. At around 19:00 on October 17, 2014, Defendant A, despite being aware of the fact that Party B demanded F to pay money as the solicitation expenditure for the instant case, Defendant A sent the horses of Party B demanding F to reduce school expenses so that the said case can be handled well, and aiding and abetting the said crime by receiving KRW 3 million from F in cash as the solicitation expenditure for the instant case from F in front of the said studulululululul, by delivering the horses of Party B, which demanded F to reduce school expenses, and by giving it on behalf of B, aiding and abetting the said crime.

2. Defendant B’s sole criminal conduct refers to the purport that, around October 18, 2014, Defendant B, at the cafeteria of “J” in the name of “J” located in “J” in “J” as above, Defendant B’s solicitation to the police officers so that the case may be handled well, and the case cost shall be set.